The UK always seems to be a little behind the US in many innovations and after several years of BlogHer conferences in the US (for female bloggers) it was only on Saturday that the first conference for 'Mummy' Bloggers took place. And I went!
I have to admit that I wasn't totally sure about going. I mean, what with 2 boys, one on the way, a PhD thesis to write and the day to day grind of daily life, I am never going to have the time to be a 'pro' blogger. The seminar titles were not filling me with excitement either, 'working with brands' and 'growing your influence' is an important aspect of blogging for many bloggers, not so much for me. BUT, the conference was being arranged by some really great bloggers AND many many many of my favourite bloggers were going. So I couldn't resist.
And it was worth every penny. First up I met a little band of expat bloggers (Paradise Lost in Translation, Not Wrong, Just Different, Potty Diaries and Pig in the Kitchen), mainly from Eastern Europe who had all come over specifically for the conference. We'd bonded in the past, tales of ex-communist state bureaucracy, traumatic flights with children and missing the family and friends support base are common to our experience. But to meet them, in person, well that was special. If I could just remember their real names and resist calling them Potty, Paradise, Pig and Iota then I feel people would stop looking at me so strangely.
The conference was very enjoyable. The seminars I wasn't so interested in I skipped and ate cakes instead and the ones I attended were fascinating. But the highlight of the day was the bloggers themselves reading their best post. Sandy Calico's post about her relationship with her father left not a dry eye in the house.
I met bloggers, bloggers and more bloggers. Some I knew already, some I didn't. All were genuinely friendly, warm, funny people. What a privilege to be included.
There were also loads of PRs and brands promoting their products, which touches upon an issue that I have never understood. Whilst I will gratefully accept sackloads of their goodies (who knew I'd got rid of so much stuff after Luke grew out of it, I mean, we'd always said that we were going to have another baby so why I thought it a good plan to turf everything out I have no idea), I still don't really understand what is in it for them. Gappy, DeerBaby, Baking Mad Mamma The Sardine Tin and Modern Dilemma all had a conversation about it (Gappy participating in between demonstrating her exceedingly excellent knowledge of pop lyrics).
So my question is, for those of you who know about these things, why are Mummy Bloggers being courted so assiduously by PR people and those looking to promote their products? I understand that blogs allow the PR people to target their products at a niche market, most people who read blogs about being a Mummy are probably also parents themselves. I get that you feel that a blog read regularly feels like a friend and when a friend recommends something you are more likely to listen to what they have to say than a glossy advertising campaign. But, my previous blog, Brits in Bosnia, which had a modicum of success and even reached the dizzy heights of 13 (or something like that) on the Tots 100 index of popular parent bloggers only ever had about 120 people reading the blog a day at its height. That isn't very many. And herein lies my confusion. Most of my readers are other bloggers. Who exactly are the PR/marketers hoping to target? And surely a blogging campaign doesn't actually reach that many people?
Is it that the PR people aren't interested in how many people actually read the blogs? Are they more interested in having a post written by a 'real mother' sitting in the annals of Google? And in the future, when someone searches on one of their products, their search turns up a little post by someone normal and people are more likely to believe that than a PR release?
That said, I still gratefully accepted the bagloads of swag on offer. There was some useful stuff in there, especially for someone preparing to be surprised by the arrival of a new baby in October. Getting it back on the bus was a whole other story.
But thank you Susanna, Sian and Jennifer for having the idea and the energy to realise it. The conference was so amazing, it far exceeded my expectations of the day. I'll be there next year, no doubt about it.
Before I forget, the Inspirational British Mummy Bloggers Carnival has just gone live, hop on over to Living With Kids to read many of the bloggers I got to meet on Saturday. It's worth it.
I think that they are hoping that mums who are web savvy but not bloggers will type product A into a search engine and then find the review that someone has written on their blog.
ReplyDeleteA review which is truthful and which is also written by someone a little like them; Has children and other commitments and wants what is best.
I would trust that.
Sounds like the conference was amazing, I'm glad you had a good time.
ReplyDeleteThe thing to understand about the PR interest in blogs (and it's not just parent blogs) is that bloggers are a relatively inexpensive way to achieve high-value coverage.
What do I mean by this?
Well, approaching a blogger is generally cheaper than approaching a professional journalist or broadcaster. You don't need to write press releases, have them approved, arrange interviews, oversee the interviews - in most cases you send a quick email pitch and perhaps a product sample.
On top of this, research consistently shows that when consumers are buying products they are influenced by TV and print advertising (and therefore conventional PR) but they are far MORE influenced by what their trusted friends say. Research shows parents trust other parents.
So if I read in the Sun that Disney is a great place to go on holiday, there's something like a 50% chance I believe it. But if another parent - one I like and trust - tells me the same thing I'm 85% likely to believe it.
When you then consider the potential reach of a blogger, this becomes a very compelling route to your client's customers. A blogger might have 100 visitors a day on their blog, but 500 followers on Twitter and 200 friends on Facebook. And if some of those people comment, link to or share that content, you've got a massive potential audience, all trusting each other, and having a conversation about your brand.
One thing to note is bloggers and PRs are still feeling their way to an extent - so the brands are approaching lots of bloggers and gradually getting a feel for who is most right for different brands and products, while bloggers are learning how to evaluate PR offers and choose those that work for them and ignore the rest. It'll all get a bit clearer as it goes on, I reckon.
Hi there, not sure if we spoke on Saturday, if you got one of my flapjacks then definitely yes.
ReplyDeleteA few thoughts based on the above...
Gina from BlogHer said that bloggers were potentially as powerful as a prime time tv show. This might sound ridiculous now but bloggers are starting to be taken a lot more seriously in the UK. I think the mummy audience is a lucrative one for brands because a) women make the decisions on household buying and b) 75% of more of buying decisions are based on word of mouth recommendation and blogs are seen as fallling into this category rather than being an advert.
Even if a blog doesn't get a lot of traffic, the post remains online indefinitely for people to google. It's like a permanent advert for very little outlay for a brand. Plus it's a word of mouth thing, it only needs one reader with a bigger audience to link to your post and masses more people could see what you've written.
There is great potential for bloggers to get "stuff" or payment from brands but unless they build this into interesting blog posts on subjects they might have written anyway, they risk turning off their readers. An iPhone snap of product on the kitchen table with "hey I got sent this for free and I used it and it works" just won't cut it. And despite the BMB campaign (which I'm yet to sign up to but intend to), there are a frightening number of bloggers still blatently featuring products with no mention that they had incentive to do so.
It was great to meet you. I too am slightly puzzled by the whole PR thing for bloggers although the comments above shed more light on it. If it's a new launch, a new product then okay perhaps they want the whole word of mouth spreading like wildfire because Mums really do talk to each other about what works and what doesn't, but a lot of it does smack of preaching to the converted. I personally steer clear of reviews and as soon as I said I didn't do reviews on my blog they turned to someone else.
ReplyDeleteMany people know far more about this subject than I do (and I say that as a journalist) so I'll be interested to read their comments.
Bear in mind that although your stats may have shown 120 visitors a day to your blog, there may have been hundreds more reading your blog through a feed aggregator.
ReplyDeleteThe PR thing is fairly simplistic if you think about your popularity. 120 people a day think highly enough of you to read what you have to say, 64% of people buy a product based on a personal recommendation - your recommendation immediately opens up new clientele and hence giving you free stuff is significantly cheaper than placing an advert in the press or on TV.
I have wondered about the PR thing too, but the comments here explain it nicely, thanks :) Glad you had a good time at the conference. Jen
ReplyDeleteIt was lovely to meet you at last and hooray! - I can get back on your blog again! It was such a good day.
ReplyDeleteI know what you mean about PRs, I wonder about this too. Although we may not have the number of readers which other websites, magazines and newspapers have I think there's a perception that readers trust bloggers more than those sneak journalists (even though some are journalists too!).
And I suppose it's about getting brands into bloggers heads so that we might start using them or talking about them without giving it much thought.
This is NOT a brag, but I get oodles of PR e-mails at the moment and I often wonder why!
With time PR companies and brands will work out what's cost-effective for them in their marketing. In the meantime enjoy the freebies!
Because we are all hitting it big time tomorrow with 10,000 feed subscribers and more. Just you wait and see.
ReplyDeleteMhm. Why doesn't that sound promising?
I would say it's all about trust - in the same way that readers of magazines trust an advertorial more than an ad, and editorial even more, readers will almost certainly trust a blog writer more than a paid journalist's article in a magazine.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, i think a lot of PR pitches to bloggers are poorly targeted and badly pitched, so in a way the client is paying the PR agency to waste an awful lot of time and money trying to interest bloggers in something they just don't have any motivation to write about.
It's a fascinating debate though - and Cybermummy sounds brilliant, I do wish I could have been there but sadly it just wasn't feasible this time.
Sounds like you had a great time. Wish I'd been there, too. I may not live in an eastern European country, but we do have seven governments for eleven million people. That must count for something in the absurdity scales.
ReplyDeleteAs a cynical hack may I offer this explanation: PRs can't get journalists to listen for love nor money nor even freebies, so they're jumping on the next best thing: bloggers. (pardon the double colon in a sentence; am sure that's not allowed.)
ReplyDeleteany mention is better than no mention, and proper advertising costs a bomb.......
It was brilliant to meet you and get to chat for a while. Thank you for the mention. I am still in shock from making 200 people cry!
ReplyDeleteRe the PR thing, a blog post will help the client's google ranking thing (I'm so untechnical and almost too tired to string a sentence together)! I reviewed the Legoland Discovery Centre in Manchester and still get around 30 hits a day from google searches for that. I'd say that if you're interested in freebies, go for it. People don't have to read your review, but someone may be interested in your opinion.
MWAH!
I am so overjoyed that we finally got to meet, you are one of my fav people ( and I do not say that lightly)!!
ReplyDeleteOn the PR side of things, I am more than happy to chat though a little if you like
So lovely to meet you on Saturday!
ReplyDeleteGlad you asked this question - the comments have been very helpful in answering it I think.
*wanders off with hugely inflated ego at thought of her own importance*
Following on from Cybermummy I went to an interesting talk by a blog expert from the US yesterday (randomly, she was giving the talk at the Christmas in July toy retailers event, which I was invited to by about five different PRs, go figure) and she explained that the reason PRs are so keen to work with bloggers here and in the US is because they are honest. I think I like that explanation best of all.
ReplyDeleteI've wondered about this too so thank you to everybody who's explained it so nicely. Sad I didn't make it to Cybermummy, but hopefully we'll get to bounce on Angels and Urchins trampoline together soon :)
ReplyDeleteMummy - That was my conclusion after a lot of thought. I think I trust it more too.
ReplyDeleteWTM - Thanks for the long comment. I hadn't thought about the extended network. And I guess it will all become clearer. I'm not against PRs or promoting things on blogs, I just didn't get why it was such a big deal. This does help explain!
Sarah - You do need to know if it is a post written because the blogger got it for free. I did have a flapjack - and it was amazing!
DeerBaby - Glad it isn't just me a bit puzzled by PR stuff. It is becoming clearer though.
Vonnie - I can see that it is cheaper than advertising proper, but I just was wondering whether it was effective for them? I have no idea about stats (actually turned the stats for this blog off) and didn't know that readers didn't register on the statcounter!
Jen - I had a wonderful time - glad I'm not the only one wondering about the conference.
Emily O - No idea what was wrong with it - you weren't the only one struggling with it. I think I'm with you on enjoying the freebies. I find that I'm picking and choosing what I need anyway, so it is working out well so far!
Met Mum - lets all retire and live off our blog earnings! Ah hem!
NVG - Oh, I think I'd be furious at some of the PR agencies if I was paying them. Some terrible pitches going on. I'm no pro but even I can see that they are dreadful!
ReplyDeleteMwa - Belgium, always held up as the case study for Bosnia. 7 govts for 11million people that is good going.
BwB - I guess that with time bad PRs won't be able to get bloggers listening either!
SC - Thanks! I can see that it does help a ranking thingy and that I would listen more to a blogger saying they had a good day out than a slick website paid for by the park.
MH - aw, thanks! I was so thrilled to meet you as I suddenly realised that I had to find you or we might not meet at all. I may take you up on that offer of a chat though.
Julie B - Likewise. Our conversation gave me confidence that I wasn't being totally stupid and the only one not to get it!
Liz - oh I like that explanation too.
Victoria - can't wait. Summer time fun. Will be lovely!